{"id":8137,"date":"2010-04-22T09:09:25","date_gmt":"2010-04-22T14:09:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/?p=8137"},"modified":"2010-03-23T15:07:37","modified_gmt":"2010-03-23T20:07:37","slug":"bagge-peter-buddy-the-dreamer","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/?p=8137","title":{"rendered":"Bagge, Peter &#8211; Buddy the Dreamer"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.peterbagge.com\/\">Website<\/a><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/images\/buddythedreamer1.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" width=\"214\" height=\"330\" \/><\/p>\n<p><strong><a href=\"http:\/\/www.amazon.com\/exec\/obidos\/ASIN\/1560971541\/xeroxarmy-20\" target=\"_blank\">Buddy the Dreamer<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>OK, maybe I rushed to judgment when I shouldn&#8217;t have. This still  isn&#8217;t the best of these books (I remember liking the last three quite a  bit), but it is a lot better than I remember it. I don&#8217;t know what my  problem with it was back in the day. I guess I had to believe that every  comic out there was breaking some boundary, otherwise it wasn&#8217;t  worthwhile. I&#8217;ve known for years now though that it can be enough for a  comic to just have a great story.<\/p>\n<p>And this book has no trouble pulling that off. This is mostly all  about Stinky&#8217;s band and Buddy trying to manage them, with the constant  Buddy\/Valerie\/Lisa drama playing out in the background. Solid stuff all  the way around and I can&#8217;t wait to move onto the next book. This does  bring up a pretty important question though. When reading all the  volumes of a series in a row, is it always best to start with #1 and  move on from there, even if the series improves significantly from one  book to the next? The volume I have also has The Bradleys in it after  these first two books. Sure, I should have read it before I started all  these, but I seldom plan that far ahead. Now what though? Would the last  couple of books in this series have been as good if I didn&#8217;t have the  previous material to refer to? Would reading The Bradleys right now make  everything else that much better, no matter what the quality of that  book was (and I seem to remember it liking the most of the three in this  volume when I read it for the first time)? Or should I wait until I  read the whole series and then go back to this story? I&#8217;ve already  decided on what I&#8217;m going to do, but I wonder what the popular opinion  is out there. Do you recommend to friends that they read the first  volumes of a series first if some of the later ones are significantly  better? I know I always tell people to buy Love and Rockets #2 before  #1.<\/p>\n<p>Oh yeah, the actual book. Sorry about that tangent there, but I am  curious to see what most people do in that situation. The strongest  stuff in this book was the relationship stuff, messed up as it is.  Seeing George on a date was classic, and having Lisa <em>be <\/em>the date  was just a fantastic story decision. I never liked Stinky much for some  reason, and that continues with this book. He&#8217;s fairly one-dimensional  in Hate, and it seems like there was more to him in Bagge&#8217;s earlier work  (which I&#8217;ll figure out soon enough, I guess). Valerie gets fleshed out  quite a bit with the visit to her parents, then is left out of most of  the rest of the book. That was one of my original problems with this  series: not as much character development as I would have liked. I can  see how ridiculous that is now that the whole series is complete, but I  always felt like I was having to assume too much when I was reading the  early stuff. This is the book that I&#8217;d probably pick to start with if  you haven&#8217;t read any Hate at all. There are bits and pieces in the first  book that you&#8217;ll miss, sure, but it&#8217;s nothing that you can&#8217;t figure out  with this book. And it&#8217;s stuff that you&#8217;ll probably be a lot happier to  see once you see how good it gets later on&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Website Buddy the Dreamer OK, maybe I rushed to judgment when I shouldn&#8217;t have. This still isn&#8217;t the best of these books (I remember liking the last three quite a bit), but it is a lot better than I remember it. I don&#8217;t know what my problem with it was back in the day. I [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[584,2478],"class_list":["post-8137","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reviews","tag-buddy-the-dreamer","tag-peter-bagge"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8137","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=8137"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8137\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8146,"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8137\/revisions\/8146"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=8137"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=8137"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=8137"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}