{"id":567,"date":"2004-12-28T15:48:04","date_gmt":"2004-12-28T21:48:04","guid":{"rendered":""},"modified":"2008-06-19T08:48:01","modified_gmt":"2008-06-19T15:48:01","slug":"dirty-danny-hellman","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/?p=567","title":{"rendered":"Dirty Danny Hellman"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><!--more--><br \/>\n<img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/images\/legal1.jpg\" border=\"0\" alt=\"\" width=\"263\" height=\"398\" \/><\/p>\n<p>Danny Hellman is in a bit of a rut right now.  In addition to<br \/>\nbeing doomed in the highly unrecognized field of comics, he is<br \/>\nfacing a $1.5 million lawsuit. Well, we&#8217;re four years into<br \/>\nthis mess, and since the fall of 2001, I&#8217;ve had a wonderful<br \/>\nlawyer named Erik Jacobs handling my case pro bono, says<br \/>\nHellman. For me, as a struggling artist, the most<br \/>\nemotionally devastating aspect of the lawsuit was the expense,<br \/>\nand thanks to Erik, these last two years of the lawsuit have<br \/>\nbeen a lot less stressful for my wife and I than the first<br \/>\nfew.<\/p>\n<p>The lawsuit is<br \/>\nover an e-mail prank Hellman circulated and a cartoon he drew<br \/>\nof fellow comic book author Ted Rall. Rall had written an<br \/>\narticle for the <em>Village Voice<\/em> boldly criticizing Art<br \/>\nSpiegelman, the well-respected, Pulitzer Prize-winning author<br \/>\nof <em>Maus<\/em>. Hellman says the cartoon that he circulated<br \/>\ncame out a day or two before the prank.<\/p>\n<p>The<br \/>\ncartoon consists of Rall drawn as a small dog in a park,<br \/>\npeeing on a statue of Spiegelman.  The prank came after Rall<br \/>\nand Hellman exchanged several private e-mails about Rall&#8217;s <em><br \/>\nVillage Voice <\/em>article.  Hellman says he found Rall&#8217;s<br \/>\ne-mails to be snide and decided to write an e-mail mocking<br \/>\nRall&#8217;s article.<br \/>\nThe e-mail, which is entitled &#8220;Ted Rall&#8217;s Balls,&#8221; featured a<br \/>\nfaux Rall bragging about his &#8220;testicular fortitude&#8221;, which he<br \/>\nearned by criticizing Spiegelman, the chain-smoking Napoleon<br \/>\nof comics.  The e-mail welcomed it&#8217;s recipients to join a<br \/>\nlist serve where the topic of discussion would be Ted Rall&#8217;s<br \/>\nballs.  Hellman says he sent the email to approximately thirty<br \/>\npeople, most of whom were already &#8220;well-acquainted&#8221; with his<br \/>\n&#8220;juvenile jokes.&#8221;  Rall was also included on the list.<\/p>\n<p>That e-mail was followed by a series of faux disgruntled<br \/>\nresponses from well-known voices in the publishing<br \/>\nindustry.  They were actually written by Hellman himself.<br \/>\n&#8220;Within a couple of days of the &#8216;Ted Rall&#8217;s Balls&#8217; e-mail, I<br \/>\nwas receiving cease &amp; desist letters from Rall&#8217;s attorneys,<br \/>\nthreatening legal action, and demanding an apology, as well as<br \/>\na five figure sum of money,&#8221; he explains. &#8220;I provided an<br \/>\napology immediately, but declined to offer any cash, (as I<br \/>\nfelt none was deserved).&#8221;  Within a few weeks, Rall&#8217;s<br \/>\nattorneys filed a $1.5 million dollar libel suit against<br \/>\nHellman.  In Hellman&#8217;s opinion the whole prank was completely<br \/>\nharmless.<\/p>\n<p>Regarding Rall&#8217;s article about Spiegelman, Hellman says, &#8220;The<br \/>\nMain thesis of the piece, (as I remember it) was a dark<br \/>\nportrait Rall struggled to paint of Art Spiegelman as a petty,<br \/>\npower-mad tyrant of the New York cartooning scene, without<br \/>\nwhose consent no aspiring cartoonist could ever hope to<br \/>\nadvance professionally.&#8221;  Hellman says Rall even attacked<br \/>\nSpiegelman&#8217;s smoking habits.<\/p>\n<p>Danny Hellman isn&#8217;t a millionaire who can easily pay a<br \/>\nsettlement to Ted Rall.  So he has put out a benefit book<br \/>\ncalled <em>Legal Action Comics Volume 1<\/em>.  The second volume<br \/>\nof his anthology is also available. &#8220;I&#8217;d wanted to do a<br \/>\ncomics anthology for years. And had tried a few times to get<br \/>\nsuch projects off the ground, with little success,&#8221; says<br \/>\nHellman. &#8220;I had done a mini comic in the early 1990s called<br \/>\n<em>Legal Action Comics<\/em>, which reprinted two strips I&#8217;d<br \/>\ndone for S<em>crew<\/em> magazine parodying Superman and the<br \/>\nSimpsons.  So in a sense, there were precedents that led to<br \/>\n2001&#8217;s <em>Legal Action Comics Volume 1<\/em>, but I&#8217;d certainly<br \/>\nhad no plans to print such a book prior to the lawsuit.&#8221;  The<br \/>\nanthology contains work from some very well-known people in<br \/>\nthe world of comics such as Robert Crumb, Sam Henderson, and<br \/>\nArt Spiegelman.  The second volume contains some returning<br \/>\ncontributors from <em>Legal Action Comics Volume 1<\/em> and some<br \/>\nnew talents as well.<\/p>\n<p>Hellman also has gotten some help from M. Doughty, former<br \/>\nfront man of the band <em>Soul Coughing<\/em>, whom he calls a<br \/>\nvery &#8220;gifted writer (as one can tell from his lyrics).&#8221;<br \/>\nHellman says he got acquainted with Doughty a few years ago at<br \/>\nthe <em>New York Press<\/em> offices, and at the newspaper&#8217;s<br \/>\n&#8220;legendary lavish parties.&#8221;  Doughty had been a writer and an<br \/>\nillustrator for the paper for several years.  Hellman says<br \/>\nthat Doughty was possibly the funniest writer the <em>New York<br \/>\nPress <\/em>ever had.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;When I got into legal hot water, Doughty and his band <em><br \/>\nSoul Coughing<\/em> were generous enough to headline a benefit<br \/>\nconcert the <em>New York Press<\/em> had organized on my<br \/>\nbehalf.   (<em>Soul Coughing<\/em> disbanded shortly after that<br \/>\nDecember 1999 concert, and I&#8217;d like to think that the sight of<br \/>\nme in clown makeup had nothing to do with that breakup).&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Danny Hellman doesn&#8217;t have any specific plans for the future.<br \/>\nHe says he has made a living as an editorial illustrator and<br \/>\nhopes to have continued success in that field. &#8220;I enjoy doing<br \/>\ncomics, and hope to do more of that, in spite of the meager<br \/>\nfinancial rewards and limited audience.&#8221;  Perhaps he&#8217;ll<br \/>\ncontinue to get by with a little help from his friends.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"mailto:homesqueeze1@yahoo.com\">Ben Durgin<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-567","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-interviews"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/567","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=567"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/567\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=567"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=567"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/opticalsloth.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=567"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}